Corey L. Gordon

Partner

Phone: 612.343.3266
Email:

BACKGROUND

Corey L. Gordon is an experienced trial lawyer whose practice includes products liability defense, class action defense, toxic and environmental torts litigation, commercial litigation, appeals, and other complex litigation.  Mr. Gordon is a frequent speaker at national CLE programs.  His recent presentations have addressed class action defense, food flavorings litigation, junk science, and successful approaches to Daubert motions and jury trials.

Mr. Gordon is admitted to practice in the state and federal district courts of Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, and Wisconsin, as well as the First, Second, Third, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Mr. Gordon has served on the Circus Juventas Board of Directors, on which he served as chairman, the Bet Shalom Congregation Board of Trustees, on which he served as President, and the boards of directors of Jewish Family and Children’s Service, the Minnesota Humane Society, the Jewish Vocational Service, the Minnesota Folk Festival, the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service, and the Ethnic Dance Theatre. He has also served on the Advisory Boards for Torah Academy and RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network). Previously, Mr. Gordon was a partner at Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P. and a Deputy Attorney General for the State of Minnesota.

EDUCATION

  • University of Minnesota Law School (J.D., 1980), cum laudeMinnesota Law Review
  • Macalester College (B.A. in Physics & Psychology, 1976), Editor-in-Chief, The Mac Weekly

AWARDS

  • America’s Top 100 High Stakes Litigators®
  • AV Preeminent® Ranking – Judicial Edition (Martindale Hubbell)
  • AV Preeminent® Ranking (Martindale-Hubbell)
  • Minnesota Super Lawyers® since 2014
  • Benchmark Litigation- Minnesota Litigation Star since 2015

PRESENTATIONS

  • Protecting your Brand during and after False Advertising Litigation, Grocery Manufacturers Association 2018 Legal Conference, New Orleans, LA.
  • Fighting Back Against Class Action Litigation, Grocery Manufacturers Association 2017 Legal Conference, San Diego, CA.
  • Diacetyl, Flavorings, and the (continued) March of Junk Science, Grocery Manufacturers Association 2016 Legal Conference, Dana Point, CA.
  • Flavorings, Colors, and Other Additives: Managing Current and Future Litigation Risks, Grocery Manufacturers Association 2014 Litigation Conference, Dana Point, CA
  • Fighting Back Against Class Action Litigation, Grocery Manufacturers Association 2017 Legal Conference, San Diego, CA
  • Is Diacetyl the New Asbestos? Flavoring Litigation in the Post-Watson World, Grocery Manufacturers Association 2013 Litigation Conference, Miami, FL.
  • Update from the Frontiers of Junk Science: The Latest Law and the Latest Trends, Grocery Manufacturers Association 2012 Foodborne Illness Litigation Conference, Dana Point, CA.

REPRESENTATIVE CASES

  • Gareis v. 3M Company (Bair Hugger™). Won a complete defense verdict for one of the world's largest global innovation manufacturing companies in the first product liability multidistrict litigation (MDL) bellwether trial in Minnesota Federal District Court. The jury agreed with the defense that the warming device did not cause surgical site infections. This case is one of more than 4,500 cases in the Minnesota MDL all involving numerous complex novel scientific legal issues. With Mr. Blackwell’s leadership, the defense team has secured dismissal of all Minnesota State cases, prevented Plaintiffs from adding punitive damages, won a significant motion to compel, securing more than $11,000 in fees and costs for client. The verdict was widely covered in the media.
  • Hebrew National Putative Nationwide Class Action. Complete defense victory for ConAgra Foods, Inc. in putative class action based on allegation that their Hebrew National brand beef products are not “100% kosher.”  The case was first dismissed with prejudice by the federal district court in Minnesota after the court agreed with the defense’s argument that plaintiffs’ claims could not be adjudicated consistent with the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.  On appeal, The Eighth Circuit agreed with the defense’s separate argument that plaintiffs also lacked Article III standing to pursue their claims.   Following remand to state court in Dakota County, Minnesota, the state district court agreed with both of the defense’s arguments regarding the First Amendment and Standing, dismissing the putative class action with prejudice.
  • General Mills East Hennepin Environmental Class Action. Defended General Mills, Inc., against class action claims brought by residents claiming vapor intrusion from groundwater contamination from a former General Mills facility. Class certification was reversed by the 8th Circuit.
  • Yo-Plus Consumer Class Action.  Defended General Mills, Inc. against a class action, on behalf of California purchasers, alleging that Yo-Plus probiotic yogurt did not promote digestive health as advertised.  General Mills retained the firm as trial counsel after the court granted class certification. Blackwell Burke obtained de-certification of the class’s claims for damages, including its claim for punitive damages. 
  • Newkirk v. ConAgra Foods.  Refuted primary argument that consumer exposure to popcorn additives was comparable to industrial-level exposure.  A Washington federal district court rendered a 70-page opinion that excluded plaintiff’s experts on Daubert grounds, granted summary judgment and dismissed all claims in favor of ConAgra Foods, Inc. Mr. Gordon argued the successful motions in the trial court and the winning appeal before the Ninth Circuit.
  • Egilman v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 1583 (2013). Represented ConAgra Foods in successfully opposing an expert’s petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.  The case involved the issue of whether an expert witness has third-party standing to appeal a district court’s Daubert ruling.

Our
Attorneys


Email Disclaimer Close

Sending us an email will not make you a client of our firm. Until we have agreed to represent you, nothing you send us will be confidential or privileged.

If your email is related to representation, the best way for you to inquire about a possible representation is to call a Blackwell Burke P.A. attorney at one of the telephone numbers listed on our Attorney's page. An attorney will first take you through our conflict of interest procedure and see that you are put in touch with the lawyer best suited to handle your matter.

If you proceed with an email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice. To proceed, click I Agree.